The Toulmin Model Of Argumentation - 853 Words

Stephen Toulmin, one of the most significant philosophers of our generation. Mr. Toulmin produced widespread analyses from morals, science, and ethical reasoning and established a different method for examining arguments, which is recognized as the Toulmin model of argumentation. Stephen Toulmin model of argumentation was not realized in Great Britain, but when he got to America those same ideas manifested to become the Toulmin model we know today. In the earlier stages of The Toulmin model it was used in debate manuals. The Toulmin model analyzes the strength and weaknesses of any argumentation. The Toulmin model has advanced into the rhetorical interpretation of literary texts. This tool is used for developing, examining, and classifying arguments. There are six parts of the model of argument from the claim, data, warrant, backing, modality, and rebuttal. The claim is the position or claim, which is argued for the deduction of the argument. For example a claim would be cars over 20 years old shouldn’t be allowed on the road. The data are the foundation or basis for the claim, the support. An example of data would be older vehicles pollute the environment and are less safe than newer car models. The warrant is also mentioned as the bridge, it is a description of why or how the data supports the claim, the underlying assumptions that links the data to the claim. An example of warrant would be removing the older car models from the road, and would drastically improve theShow MoreRelatedKeynote Address : Argumentative Analysis1512 Words   |  7 Pagesthe Toulmin model of argumentation. This model consists primarily of a claim, which is the assertion the rhetor attempts to prove, supporting evidence for the claim, and a warrant connecting the evidence to the claim. Secondary elements of this model include backing supporting the warrant, the countering of potential rebuttals to the claim, and qualifiers, which modify the claim to make it less susceptible t o such opposition. By strategically implementing certain elements of the Toulmin model, ObamaRead MoreResearch On Students Learning1100 Words   |  5 Pagessignificance of the processes of critical reasoning and use of argumentation for the construction and justification of scientific knowledge through language (Driver, Newton, Osborne, 1998; Driver, Asoko, Leach, Mortimer, Scott, 1994). This study focused on design and evolution of alternative instructional strategies and tools that foster the use of argumentation in physics education. As an instructional strategy, argumentation promotes critical thinking, epistemological developmentRead MoreWhen Is The Last Time You Fought With Someone For Hours1552 Words   |  7 Pagesmay have begged your teacher to let you hand in an assignment late, or tried to convince your parents to extend your curfew. You may have been disappointed when you failed to succeed in this, most likely because the lack of proper argumentation technique. Argumentation takes place all around the world in messages designed to influence other beliefs and behaviors. A rational argument adapts to the audience in an ethical manner, fulfills the requirements of presumption and burden of proof and effectivelyRead MoreThe Toulmin Model Of Argument 11533 Words   |  7 Pagesï » ¿ The Toulmin Model of Argument (adapted from: http://schoolnet.org.za/twt/09/M9_argumentation.pdf) In his work on logic and argument, The Uses of Argument, Stephen Toulmin indicates three major, necessary parts of an argument, along with three additional, optional parts. The three major parts are the claim, the support, and the warrants. Claim: This is the disputable assertion for which a speaker argues. The claim may be directly stated or the claim may be implied. You can find the claim by askingRead MoreArgument Of An Open Source Visualisation Tool8116 Words   |  33 PagesArgument Visualisation tools 1. Abstract 2. Introduction Argumentation is the area that studies the relation between a claim and any statement that supports or opposes this claim. Argument visualisation is the way to present the arguments, which make it easy way to analysis and evaluate. There are many tools help to visualise arguments used different type of visualisation, such as, network, tree, and table. Argument graph is import to summarize the complex argument on documents, which makeRead MorePoor Study Habits4822 Words   |  20 Pagesissue. Paul Elder (2006) provide a checklist for reasoning, which primarily highlights giving â€Å"inferences by which we draw conclusions and give meaning to data† (p.7). They also emphasize that reasoning â€Å"has implications and consequences† (ibid.). Toulmin (2000) moreover underscores the requirements of reasoning which involve â€Å"examination of the claim or position in any given issue, and analysis of the evidence and justifications offered to support such claim, along with an analysis of the refutationsRead MoreInformation Security15951 Words   |  64 Pagesconstructs, and/or models (see additional discussions about this under the â€Å"Apply the Literature† below). As such, a literature review for each stream of theory or construct may be relevant. In such cases, one may find numerous studies on a specific theo ry, model, or framework. Thus, deciding which piece of literature should be included as part of the literature review can be a daunting task for novice researchers. One common example is the extensive work done on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) by DavisRead MoreAristotles Rhetoric Theory2285 Words   |  10 PagesRhetoric Rhetorical Theory centered on the 4th Century BC writings of Aristotle. Aristotle’s Rhetoric was the seminal work which was later revised by others including Kenneth Burke (dramatism) and Toulmin (argument model). George A. Kennedy (2004) wrote the most respected, authoritative and explanatory translation of Aristotle’s Rhetoric but an older translation by W. Rhys Roberts (1954) is available online for free. Aristotle’s mentor, Plato (385 BC), reacted to theRead MoreCommunication And Conflict Resolution Within Communications1751 Words   |  8 Pagesaltogether. While researching just how effective conflict resolution could be if applied correctly the ADR model was extremely helpful when addressing the perks that assists’ conflict resolution, it called Alternative Dispute Resolution and or ADR. The models of which ADR embraces are essential factors when attempting to combat disruptive communication altercations. ADR practices several models including policy dialoging, deliberative discourses, and negotiation compromising tactics. These are allRead MoreConflict Resolution Toolkit4549 Words   |  19 Pagesadministrative agencies. Resolving conflict is a management strategy where businesses should learn to study and practice conflict management skills to keep up a positive work environment (Reina, 2010). Hitchcock Verheij (2006) stated that the Toulmin Model of Argumentation declares that most of the arguments involve the following six elements: 1. Claim 2. Grounds 3. Warrant: A warrant connects the information with the grounds in response to the claim, which legitimize the claim by depicting the grounds